Huh

Kinja'd!!! "CB" (jrcb)
03/04/2017 at 18:06 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!1 Kinja'd!!! 6
Kinja'd!!!

I thought there’d be more of a price difference between the Tacoma and the Tundra. Weird.


DISCUSSION (6)


Kinja'd!!! Patrick Nichols > CB
03/04/2017 at 18:09

Kinja'd!!!0

I think there is once you get into options that most non fleet customers choose. I’d imagine the average tundra sells for 45-50k while the taco is probably 35-38k


Kinja'd!!! Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo > CB
03/04/2017 at 18:21

Kinja'd!!!2

Nope. My employer bought a fleet of new Tundras a few years back because they were near the same price as a base model Tacoma. I was fortunate enough to get a Tacoma I had lobbied for. A longbed Tundra incredibly excessive for what I was doing for two years.


Kinja'd!!! gogmorgo - rowing gears in a Grand Cherokee > CB
03/04/2017 at 19:03

Kinja'd!!!1

Taco’s are overpriced. Tundras are cheap because otherwise they’d be priced out of the market.


Kinja'd!!! HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > CB
03/04/2017 at 19:48

Kinja'd!!!1

This shows a much bigger gap. I had to ad a silly border because kinda kept cropping out the Tacoma price.

Kinja'd!!!

Also regular cab Tacomas seem to be very rare, I saw on the other day and just thought “I dint remember the last time I saw one of those.” Then again Tundras are probably 1/10 of the trucks in the area I live in.


Kinja'd!!! CB > HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles
03/04/2017 at 19:59

Kinja'd!!!0

This is also Canadian pricing.


Kinja'd!!! HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles > CB
03/04/2017 at 21:10

Kinja'd!!!0

So basically Canadian Tundras are cheaper, but Canadian Tacomas are about the same price.